In partnership with
Hey Creator,
What's actually deciding whether AI output sounds like you — the way you ask, or what it already knows about you?
Most people assume it's the first. It's actually both, and the second one is where the real difference shows up.
Let’s look into it!
Prompt vs. Context — Which One Are You Missing?
You've probably spent real time trying to write the perfect prompt — adding detail, changing the wording, specifying the tone, asking for a rewrite, then another.
Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn't. That's prompt engineering, and on its own, it's only half the equation. The other half is context engineering — and it's usually the piece creators skip.
First, what Prompt Engineering actually is:
Prompt engineering is giving AI clear instructions — something like "write a LinkedIn post about AI video tools in a friendly tone." It's straightforward, and it works well for one-off tasks.
The clearer your instructions, the better the response tends to be. For a long time, that was enough. But the more creators used AI daily, the more they ran into the same problem: every new chat felt like starting over.
And what Context Engineering actually is:
Context engineering is giving AI the information it needs before you ask it to create anything. Where a prompt tells it what you want right now, context tells it who you are, who you're making this for, and what you've already built.
Instead of relying on one carefully worded prompt, you build a complete picture for it to work from:
Your audience
Your writing style
Previous newsletters or posts
Brand guidelines
Research notes or reference material
The AI spends less time guessing and more time producing something actually usable.
Where the two split apart:
Think about what you repeat every time you open a chat.
You explain your audience. You describe your brand voice. You mention you prefer simple language. You remind it what you're working on.
None of that is part of the task itself — it's the background that helps the AI approach the task correctly. A prompt can be perfectly written and still miss, simply because it's missing that background.
That's the real difference: prompt engineering optimizes the ask, context engineering optimizes what the AI already has before the ask arrives.
Where this already lives in the tools you use:
This isn't a theory you need to build from scratch — most AI tools already have a place for it:
ChatGPT has Custom Instructions and Projects, where you can store recurring context
Claude has Projects and a memory feature that carries details across conversations
Gemini has Gems, which work the same way — a saved setup you reuse instead of rebuilding each time
If you're already paying for one of these tools, the context layer is likely sitting there unused.
A simple before-and-after:
Ask AI to "write an Instagram caption about video editing," and you'll get a decent caption — that's prompt engineering doing its job.
Now ask it to write that caption for your specific audience — people who aren't highly technical, want practical advice, and prefer writing that's conversational and jargon-free.
The task didn't change. The context did. That's the entire difference between the two, in one example.
How to actually start:
You don't need a complicated system. Put together one simple document with:
Who your audience is
Your brand voice
The kind of content you create
A couple of examples of writing you're proud of
Words or phrases you tend to avoid
Keep that on hand whenever you're working with AI. Over time, you'll spend less time rewriting prompts and more time refining ideas.
One thing worth remembering:
Context isn't a one-time setup. If your style guide or examples go stale — an old campaign, an audience description that's since shifted — the AI keeps working from outdated information without telling you.
Worth revisiting every so often, the same way you'd update any reference document.
The takeaway:
Prompt engineering isn't going away — clear instructions still matter. But the creators getting the best results aren't only writing better prompts. They're pairing them with better context.
The Free Playbook Behind Millions in Off-Amazon Revenue
Most eCommerce brands running external traffic aren't scaling — they're just spending.
Wrong channels, no real attribution, and at the end of the month, still no clear answer to the only question that matters: what actually moved your BSR?
The brands getting it right aren't necessarily spending more. They've just stopped guessing. They know which channels pull weight on Amazon listings, which ones look good in a dashboard but bleed budget, and why creator traffic consistently outperforms paid social on ROI when it's set up correctly.
Levanta put together a free playbook breaking down 7 proven external traffic strategies. Inside you'll see how top brands are driving millions in off-Amazon revenue and why most channels underdeliver when brands don't know what to look for before they start spending.
If you're serious about growing outside of PPC, this is worth 5 minutes.
